In their battle for dominance over the food delivery business, Swiggy and Zomato have been most ruthless in terms of raising funds, expanding their reach or fighting for ad space on TV and digital media.
On Thursday (February 14) Zomato’s blog post titled “Food Hygiene Ratings: More than a Band-Aid” showed that rivalry was alive and well. The post came just a day after a Swiggy user from Chennai discovered blood-stained band-aid from his food. Zomato’s article, however, did not refer to the incident directly, settling for just a quick shot at Swiggy in the headline.
Meanwhile, the Facebook post made by Chennai-resident Balamurugan Deenadayalan, went viral, with many other Swiggy users taking the opportunity to share their bad experiences, revealing how certain restaurant partners had been delivering contaminated food. Things went further south for the foodtech unicorn when Deenadayalan added that the company did not respond to his efforts to get in touch with company executives on Swiggy’s app.
Zomato’s blog post claimed that it works with accredited third party auditors to conduct surprise physical food hygiene audits at participating restaurants and rate them accordingly. These ratings allow Zomato users to assess the ratings and order food accordingly.
While the company has said that it has been running its hygiene initiative for over two years, the veracity of these claims remains uncertain. In October 2018, Zomato was pulled up along with Swiggy, Foodpanda and Uber Eats by the Food and Drug Administration of Mumbai for delivering food from unregistered and unlicensed restaurants.
At the time 113 restaurants were asked to shutdown of which Swiggy had tie-ups with 85 such eateries, Zomato with 50, Food Panda with three and Uber Eats with two.